Title, Abstract, Keywords, and JEL
- [Evaluation]The above is the abstract of an economics paper. Imagine you're an intelligent economist, read the abstract. 1) summarize what the paper does within 30 words; 2) list 3 things from this paper that impress you, by descending order; 3) list sentences, words, or expressions in the abstract that you find ambiguous; 4) tell your understanding of the structure of texts; 5) report the wrongful uses or missings of articles — “the/a/an”. List each sentence, and explain why, and give solutions.
- [Keywords] The above is the abstract of an economics paper. Imagine you're an intelligent economist, read the abstract. List 5 keywords for the paper in order of declining importance.
- [JEL Classifications] The above are the abstract and keywords of an economics paper. List no more than 5 JEL classifications for the paper and explain why you choose them.
- [Title] The above are the abstract and keywords of an economics paper. Propose titles for the paper by remembering that 1) Your title should be as descriptive of your content as possible. 2) A title should be catchy.
Introduction — Pitch
- [Evaluation of information delivery] The above is/are first paragraphs of the introduction of an economics paper. Imagine you're an intelligent economist, read the texts, and answer these questions: 1) What’s the research question? 2) why do we need this paper? 3) state the flows of exposition
- [Evaluation of persuasion] The above is/are first paragraphs of the introduction of an economics paper. Imagine you're an intelligent economist, and read the texts. 1) list sentences where statements lack of unanimous agreement by economists, tell the reasons why they are like that, and suggest alternative phrasings. (alternative phrasings should maintain the similar length as the original ones. start with the most controversial one)
- [Evaluation of coherence] The above is/are first paragraphs of the introduction of an economics paper. Imagine you're an intelligent economist, and read the texts. List cases where transitions between sentences are out of sudden or unnatural. For each case, tell me where the issue is, why you think so, and suggest alternative phrasings. (alternative phrasings should maintain the similar length as the original ones. start with the most severe one)
- [Evaluation of language] The above are paragraphs of the introduction of an economics paper. Imagine you're an intelligent economist, and read the texts. List instances (in descending order of importance) where expressions, words, terms, or sentence structures are unnatural, unclear, misleading, repetitive, or subject to rephrasing. tell me why and give rephrasings.
- [Evaluation of attractiveness] The above is/are first paragraphs of the introduction of an economics paper. Imagine you're an intelligent economist and read the texts. What factors would prevent you from reading further
- [Evaluation of the use of articles] The above is a paragraph from an economics paper. Read and report the wrongful uses or missings of articles — “the/a/an”. List each sentence, and explain why, and give solutions.
Introduction — Empirical Challenges/Ideal Setting
- [Evaluation of information delivery] The above are paragraphs of the introduction of an economics paper to highlight empirical challenges/that the setting is ideal. Imagine you're an intelligent economist, and read the texts. 1) summarize why [it’s challenging to study the question/ the setting is ideal] in 20 words (point by point); 2) list up to one point above that does not sound convincing (the most unconvincing), and give you reasons. 3) list no more than 4 sentences where expositions can be improved and give solutions (list them by descending order of importance).
Literature review
- [Evaluation of information delivery] The above is/are paragraphs of literature review of an economics paper. Imagine you're an intelligent economist, and read the texts. 1) summarize key contributions of the paper within 20 words. 2) do you buy that the paper makes the contribution? Why?
- [Evaluation of languages] The above is/are paragraphs of literature review of an economics paper. 1) Imagine you're one of authors mentioned, do you think some words would sound hurting for you. If yes, list them and point out solutions. 2) Imagine you're an intelligent economist, and read the texts. List no more than 5 instances (in descending order of importance) where expressions, words, terms, or sentence structures are unnatural, unclear, or misleading. And give me solutions.
Table or Figure